Battle of the Budget Tablets - Nook Color vs. Galaxy Tab
by Vivek Gowri on May 25, 2011 12:52 AM ESTRound 1 - Performance
Performance-wise, the Galaxy Tab does pretty well. The Hummingbird SoC used by the previous Galaxy Tabs has always been faster than OMAP 3, even the 1GHz 3630, so the WiFi version is slower than its 3G brethen. Both tablets have OMAP 3 and Cortex A8s, but the 1GHz implementation in the Galaxy Tab is faster than the Nook's 800MHz core, pretty much the whole way down the line.
Interestingly, we couldn’t get some of our tests running on the Nook - there was no way to get a score for Kwaak3 without reassigning hardware keys (you need to use the search key to bring up the FPS counter at the end of the test run), and Neocore just flat-out would not run. But basically, there’s about a 10-20% difference in CPU performance that is mostly put down entirely to the clock speed difference. The Nook has a higher BrowserMark score because of the stock Android 2.3 browser, and a very good Sunspider score because of the JavaScript improvements in Gingerbread, but overall, it’s outmatched.
We see about the same margin of victory for the Galaxy Tab over the Nook Color in the gaming benchmarks as well, even with the same SGX 530 graphics processor. However, we can see SGX 530 trailing SGX 540 by a long way here, which is a bit disappointing. SGX 540 is more powerful than SGX 530 by a factor of two, and Samsung's switching of SoC here feels like they cut some corners in getting the WiFi edition out the door as cheaply as possible.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
89 Comments
View All Comments
nomagic - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
Because it is so damned affordable...medi01 - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
Nah. Street price for WiFi Samsung Galaxy Tab is about 260$.Basically this article sounds like hidden advertisment / Samsung bashing.
Galaxy Tab is vastly superior. Screen is NOT better than that of Nook (I know, I've used both). With contrast of 700+ you care more about max brightness, than max contrast.
Samsung's device is solid.
And "hacker undriendlines" of Galaxy Tab is sush a piece of bull**it, it's rootable for ages, and there are custom roms. Not that it's built in ROM really needs rooting, as Nook does.
VivekGowri - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
Where are you seeing that street price? For a new one, the lowest I can see is $340 on Amazon, $345 on Google Shopping results, and $349 from most standard retailers. There's less out there for the Galaxy Tab as far as ROMs and the like, but just to root it, yeah just run SuperOneClick and you're all good. The point being that unlike the Galaxy Tab, you need to hack the Nook to make it useful, and once you do, you have more options than with the Samsung.Look, I like the Galaxy Tab, I've got two here and they're both great devices. I also like the Galaxy Tab more than the Nook Color, it says pretty clearly there that the Galaxy Tab is definitely the better device. If you can find it for $260 (the refurb deal on Woot, maybe), yes, no brainer right there. At $350, only $50 less than the ASUS Transformer, hell no. If you're looking for a cheap and cheerful barebones tablet, the Nook works better simply because it's a lot cheaper.
And just for the record, the reason the screen is better has more to do with the viewing angles that come with the IPS display in the Nook, but as far as regular TN LCD panels go, the Galaxy Tab is one of the best. I can't wait to see the AMOLED panel in the next-gen Galaxy Tab 7".
DJMiggy - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
The 3G/WiFi galaxy tab refurbished was 259.99 on woot today but that is sold out. Must be where you are getting that price from unless you mean with a two year contract which you can get it on Sprint's Network for $199.99 with a 2 year contract.zvadim - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
Overstock had a refurb Nook Color for $183 shipped a few days back & B&N sold brand new ones on e-bay a few times for $200.kkwst2 - Friday, May 27, 2011 - link
Yeah, I recall some refurb prices for a little over $100. If you can put up with its speed, it is a great deal given the screen quality.redechelon - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
First off, great article! (in typical Anandtech fashion)But... the Asus Eee Pad Transformer seems like too much of a solid competitor to leave out of this budget category. I realize it's slightly more expensive ($399/$400) than these, but it seems th $50 difference from the Galaxy is well worth it, just a thought.
redechelon - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
I also realize you talked about it, i just couldn't get over it =P. Out of the 2 though, I'd take the nook as well... would be fun to monkey with.VivekGowri - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
Yeaaaap, the Transformer's pricepoint just blew the 7" Galaxy Tab off the market. I mentioned it at the beginning and only really discussed it at the end, but I figured that it made more sense to compare these two, since they're pretty similar, instead of comparing to any of the Honeycomb tablets.medi01 - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link
No it didn't. No GPS, no 3G, crappy software, unpolished hardware.I don't get where do you get your conslusions from, guys. From articles filled with lies/semi-lies like this one?